Habitat Loss Does Not Always Entail Negative Genetic Consequences

Carvalho, Carolina S. and Lanes, Éder C. M. and Silva, Amanda R. and Caldeira, Cecilio F. and Carvalho-Filho, Nelson and Gastauer, Markus and Imperatriz-Fonseca, Vera L. and Nascimento Júnior, Wilson and Oliveira, Guilherme and Siqueira, José O. and Viana, Pedro L. and Jaffé, Rodolfo (2019) Habitat Loss Does Not Always Entail Negative Genetic Consequences. Frontiers in Genetics, 10. ISSN 1664-8021

[thumbnail of pubmed-zip/versions/1/package-entries/fgene-10-01101.pdf] Text
pubmed-zip/versions/1/package-entries/fgene-10-01101.pdf - Published Version

Download (2MB)

Abstract

Although habitat loss has large, consistently negative effects on biodiversity, its genetic consequences are not yet fully understood. This is because measuring the genetic consequences of habitat loss requires accounting for major methodological limitations like the confounding effect of habitat fragmentation, historical processes underpinning genetic differentiation, time-lags between the onset of disturbances and genetic outcomes, and the need for large numbers of samples, genetic markers, and replicated landscapes to ensure sufficient statistical power. In this paper we overcame all these challenges to assess the genetic consequences of extreme habitat loss driven by mining in two herbs endemic to Amazonian savannas. Relying on genotyping-by-sequencing of hundreds of individuals collected across two mining landscapes, we identified thousands of neutral and independent single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in each species and used these to evaluate population structure, genetic diversity, and gene flow. Since open-pit mining in our study region rarely involves habitat fragmentation, we were able to assess the independent effect of habitat loss. We also accounted for the underlying population structure when assessing landscape effects on genetic diversity and gene flow, examined the sensitivity of our analyses to the resolution of spatial data, and used annual species and cross-year analyses to minimize and quantify possible time-lag effects. We found that both species are remarkably resilient, as genetic diversity and gene flow patterns were unaffected by habitat loss. Whereas historical habitat amount was found to influence inbreeding; heterozygosity and inbreeding were not affected by habitat loss in either species, and gene flow was mainly influenced by geographic distance, pre-mining land cover, and local climate. Our study demonstrates that it is not possible to generalize about the genetic consequences of habitat loss, and implies that future conservation efforts need to consider species-specific genetic information.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Research Scholar Guardian > Medical Science
Depositing User: Unnamed user with email support@scholarguardian.com
Date Deposited: 06 Mar 2023 11:05
Last Modified: 06 Nov 2023 04:01
URI: http://science.sdpublishers.org/id/eprint/151

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item