Comparative Evaluation of Colour Difference using Different Digital Photography Equipment to Standardise Colour Assessment in Dental Photography

Patel, Jaimini Jigar and Shah, Nimisha Chinmay and Shah, Ruchi Rani and Kothari, Meghna and Porwal,, Priya and Batra, Renu (2023) Comparative Evaluation of Colour Difference using Different Digital Photography Equipment to Standardise Colour Assessment in Dental Photography. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 17 (3). ZC12-ZC16. ISSN 2249782X

[thumbnail of 58797_CE[Ra1]_F(IS)_PF1(AB_JD_SS)_PN(KM).pdf] Text
58797_CE[Ra1]_F(IS)_PF1(AB_JD_SS)_PN(KM).pdf - Published Version

Download (975kB)

Abstract

Introduction: Photography has always been thought to be an important part of dentistry. Since the introduction of digital technology; imaging has become simpler and more accessible. Colour matching is critical for the success of restorative and prosthetic dental treatments, also communication with the dental laboratory is still subjective, and further research is needed on this aspect.

Aim: To compare the colour difference using different digital photography equipments to standardise colour assessment in dental photography.

Materials and Methods: A single blind clinical study was conducted on total 22 participants from December 2020 to June 2021. A spectrophotometer was used to determine the Colour space defined by International Commission on Illumination (CIELAB) values of the right central incisor for each participant. They were then photographed with five different photography equipment along with a grey reference card. The five different groups were: Group A: Canon 1300D Digital Single Lens Reflex (DSLR) with 100 mm lens and pop-up flash (N=22). Group B: Canon 1300D DSLR+100 mm lens+70 GSM white tissue paper (N=22). Group C: Canon 1300D DSLR+100 mm lens with ring flash (N=22). Group D: Canon 1300D DSLR+100 mm lens+ring flash+diffuser (N=22). Group E: Iphone 11 (N=22). CIELAB values were obtained for all the groups using adobe Photoshop software after white balancing. Delta E was calculated by comparing CIELAB values of each group with the spectrophotometer values. The data was tabulated and analysed with one way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Posthoc test using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) version 20.0 software with p-value <0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results: Mean value of Delta E was least in group D (DSLR+ ring flash with diffuser) (5.033) followed by group B (DSLR+ pop up flash with white tissue paper) (6.57), group A (DSLR+pop-up flash) (10.70), group E (Iphone11) (10.74) and highest in group C (DSLR+ ring flash) (11.32).

Conclusion: Group D (DSLR+ring flash with diffuser) was determined to be closest to the standard spectrophotometric values for colour assessment in dental photography.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Research Scholar Guardian > Medical Science
Depositing User: Unnamed user with email support@scholarguardian.com
Date Deposited: 22 Jun 2023 08:45
Last Modified: 16 Jan 2024 04:43
URI: http://science.sdpublishers.org/id/eprint/1221

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item